Connecticut Law Tribune

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Stone v. Pattis

Superior Court

May 9, 2012

Trial courts possess the authority to order sanctions against an attorney who allegedly engages in dilatory, bad faith and harassing litigation conduct, pursuant to Stein v. Horton, a 2007 decision of the Connecticut Appellate Court.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions