Connecticut Law Tribune

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Linsley v. FMS Investment Corp.

U.S. District Court

April 25, 2012

The Higher Education Act expressly pre-empts 'the operation of state usury laws, statutes of limitations, limitations on recovering the costs of debt collection, infancy defenses to contract liability, wage garnishment limitations, and disclosure requirements,' pursuant to iChae v. SLM Corp./i, a 2010 decision of the 9th Circuit.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions