When ruling whether a current activity expands a nonconforming use, courts may consider: 1.) the extent to which the current use reflects the nature and purpose of the original use; 2.) differences in the character, nature and kind of use; and 3.) substantial differences in the effect of the different activities.
301 Eagle Street LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Bridgeport
March 8, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.