Connecticut Law Tribune

Home > Patriot National Bank v. Braverman

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Patriot National Bank v. Braverman

Lavine, J.Other Decisions

Connecticut Appellate Court

March 21, 2012

As stated in the 1991 Connecticut Appellate Court case of iScarsdale National Bank Trust Co. v. Schmitz/i, '[a] party cannot be aggrieved by a decision that grants the very relief sought' and, here, although the court denied the defendant's motion to reopen a judgment of foreclosure by sale to reduce the amount of the mortgage debt, the defendant received the relief he requested and was not aggrieved by the trial court's decision.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
The Law.com Network
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions