Connecticut Law Tribune

Home > Nano v. Competitive Technologies Inc.

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Nano v. Competitive Technologies Inc.

Tyma, J.Other Decisions

Superior Court

January 26, 2012

In iVincent Builders Inc. v. American Application Systems Inc./i, a 1988 decision, the Connecticut Appellate Court wrote, 'An arbitrator's participation in ex parte communications with a party or witness, without the knowledge or consent of the other party, may constitute misconduct on the part of the arbitrator sufficient to warrant vacation of an arbitration award.'

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
The Law.com Network
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions