Literal infringement requires that the accused device embody every element of the claim, and infringement under the doctrine of equivalents requires that the accused device perform substantially the same function in substantially the same way to obtain the same result.
Potts v. Cur-Tech LLC
U.S. District Court
March 14, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.