Connecticut Law Tribune

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal

Connecticut Supreme Court

June 26, 2012

Under Connecticut General Statutes §21-80a, if a resident proves that he or she engaged in one or more of the protected activities enumerated in C.G.S. §21-80a(a) within the six months preceding the park owner's eviction preceding, the owner may not maintain a summary process action against that resident unless the owner can show that one of the exceptions specified in C.G.S. §21-80a(b) applies.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions