"Sculptural" elements of a toy may qualify for copyright protection, even if the applicant allegedly fails to disclose to the Copyright Office that some elements of the toy are "functional."
Font Size:
![]()
Lego A/S v. Best-Lock Construction Toys Inc.
U.S. District Court
July 23, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.


