Because the defendant did not appear and claim at the hearing on his motion to open the judgment of strict foreclosure, that title to the property had not vested in the plaintiff or that abode service of the summons and complaint was somehow improper, the court could grant the motion in accord with C.G.S. §49-15(a)(2) only upon the agreement of the parties.
Selene Finance, L.P. v. Tornatore
Connecticut Appellate Court
July 30, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.