A former attorney's conviction on charges of arranging fraudulent marriages can qualify as "substantial and probative evidence" of an applicant's conspiracy to enter into a marriage to evade U.S. immigration laws.
Koffi v. Holder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit
July 30, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.