Connecticut Law Tribune

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Khan v. Hillyer

Connecticut Supreme Court

September 3, 2012

A civil contempt order requiring the contemnor to incur a cost or take specific action?such as paying for supervised visitation?satisfies the second prong of the test in the 1983 case of State v. Curcio and, therefore, constitutes an appealable final judgment.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions