Evidence regarding potential impacts to wetlands in the event of a detention basin's failure was speculative in nature and did not amount to substantial evidence to support a denial of a permit application for regulated activities under the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act, C.G.S. §22a-28.
Estate of Machowski v. Inland Wetlands Commission of the City of Ansonia
Connecticut Appellate Court
September 10, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.