Legal improprieties in jury instructions, even those that pertain to elements of offenses, may well be harmless error if they do not pertain to ?critical factual issues? in the case as demonstrated by the evidence and highlighted by closing arguments, thereby indicating beyond a reasonable doubt that the jury was not misled.
State v. Devalda
Connecticut Supreme Court
October 1, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.