Chief Justice Rehnquist's analysis in his concurrence in the 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case of U.S. v. Dixon applying the 1932 U.S. Supreme Court case of Blockburger v. U.S., is more consistent with Connecticut's contemporary double jeopardy jurisprudence than that of Justice Scalia and was adopted.
State v. Bernacki
Connecticut Supreme Court
October 8, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.