Although the substitute information did not specifically state the element of operation on a public highway for a conviction of operating a motor vehicle without a driver's license in violation of C.G.S. §14-36(a), it provided the defendant with the statutory section under which he was charged and the time and place of the incident, which was sufficient to inform him of the charges against him.
State v. Vlahos
Connecticut Appellate Court
October 8, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.