To prevail on a due-process liberty claim, a plaintiff must allege 1.) the utterance of a statement about her that is injurious to her reputation, that is capable of being proved false, and that she claims is false; and 2.) some tangible and material state-imposed burden in addition to the stigmatizing statement, pursuant to Velez v. Levy, a 2005 decision of the 2nd Circuit.
Nyenhuis v. Metropolitan District Commissio
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit
November 12, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.