A child witness was available for confrontation purposes under the 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case of Crawford v. Washington where the lack of cross-examination resulted from a strategic election by the defendant and the witness could have been cross-examined on, for example, her memory and understandings of truth and fantasy.
State v. Cameron M.
Connecticut Supreme Court
November 19, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.