The defendant did not have an expectation of privacy in the attic space of a six unit rooming house that society would recognize as reasonable given his lack of control over the open attic located in a common area and unfettered public access to the interior of the building.
Font Size: 
State v. Pierre
Connecticut Appellate Court
November 19, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
