Connecticut Law Tribune

Font Size: increase font decrease font

State v. Paredes

Connecticut Appellate Court

November 19, 2012

When the primary purpose of videotaped statements is to receive a medical diagnosis or treatment, not future criminal prosecution, the confrontation clause is not implicated.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions