When ruling whether a duty of care exists, courts may consider: 1.) the normal expectations of participants in the activity; 2.) the public policy of balancing participation in the activity and safety; 3.) the avoidance of increased litigation; and 4.) the decisions of courts in other jurisdictions.
Angelo v. Quesada
December 10, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.