Connecticut Law Tribune

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Lynch v. Ackley

U.S. District Court

December 24, 2012

Denial of reimbursement for foregoing health insurance may be equivalent to a reduction in pay and qualify as an adverse employment action, for purposes of First Amendment retaliation claims and Connecticut General Statutes §31-51q.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions