The defendant's argument challenging use and occupancy payment amounts did not relate to the physical use and occupancy of the premises and was not a claim that properly could be considered during a disbursement hearing under C.G.S. §47a-26f.
Font Size: 
Brennan Associates v. Radioshack Corporation
Superior Court
January 7, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
