A judgment in favor of a party on both an express and an implied in law contract does not constitute reversible error in every instance, although the plaintiff cannot receive a double recovery, as the Appellate Court stressed in the 2006 case of MD Drilling & Blasting, Inc. v. MLS Construction, LLC.
300 State, LLC v. Hanafin
Connecticut Appellate Court
January 28, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.