An attorney who allegedly refuses to take his seat during a municipal board meeting when informed that the attorney is out of order can engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of Rule 8.4(4) of the Rules of Conduct
Brow v. Gudis
Statewide Grievance Committee
February 18, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.