Connecticut Law Tribune

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Intellectual Property

Injunctions, Sunset Royalties And Future Royalty Rates

The Connecticut Law Tribune

October 5, 2012

Even after winning a patent infringement case, a plaintiff still may not get an injunction prohibiting ongoing infringement by the defendant. In ActiveVideo v. Verizon, Case No. 2011-1538 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 24, 2012) the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit further explained why that is, illustrated how various factors should be weighed to determine whether to issue an injunction, and offered guidance concerning how to calculate an appropriate royalty in the event an injunction does not issue.

The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.

lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions