Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Special Issues
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts
  • Books
  • Lawjobs
  • Events

Home > Lacking a Duty, State Is Spared Liability in 'Tragic' Boat Mishap

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Lacking a Duty, State Is Spared Liability in 'Tragic' Boat Mishap

By Joel Stashenko Contact All Articles 

New York Law Journal

November 30, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Related Items

  • Estate of Mary Helen Metz v. NYS, No. 208

ALBANY - The State is not liable for the deaths and injuries caused when an excursion boat tipped over on Lake George, the state Court of Appeals decided yesterday.

Twenty passengers were killed and several of the 27 others on board the Ethan Allen were injured in the 2005 accident.

Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman (See Profile), writing for a 6-0 court, called the capsizing of the Ethan Allen "tragic" and "disastrous."

However, the plaintiffs in Metz v. State of New York, 208, have failed to demonstrate that a "special duty" existed between the state and the passengers on the Ethan Allen the day it capsized that would overcome the state's argument that it was protected from liability by sovereign immunity, Lippman said.

Citing the Court of Appeals' rulings in O'Connor v. City of New York, 58 NY2d 184 (1983), Valdez v. City of New York, 18 NY3d 69 (2011) and McLean v. City of New York, 12 NY3d 194 (2009), Lippman said it is now "well settled" that the state is "not liable for the negligent performance of a government function" unless there existed "a special duty to the injured person, in contrast to a general duty owed to the public."

"The regulatory scheme at issue here does require inspectors to issue a certificate of inspection indicating that the vessel is safe and, specifically, certifying the number of passengers the vessel can safely transport," Lippman wrote. "However, these statutory obligations do not create a special duty of care owed by the state to particular passengers."

Although the Navigation Law statute that mandates inspections of public vessels by the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation is designed to protect public safety in general, it "did not create a duty to particular individuals," the chief judge wrote.

Moreover, he said that the court's conclusion was bolstered by the fact that the Navigation Law does not provide a private right of action against the state, but instead for fines and criminal penalties to be imposed upon vessel owners and operators for violations.

Lippman noted that the law was amended in 2007 in response to the Ethan Allen accident. While requiring additional safety measures and enhancing penalties for violations, the Legislature "did not provide for a private right of action," the chief judge said.

Lippman said the court was aware that the "upshot" of current law is to leave victims "without an adequate remedy."

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Appellate Division
  • Associated Press
  • Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
  • Ethan Allen Inc.
  • U.S. Coast Guard
  • Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Transportation Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Questions Raised About Legal Malpractice Policies
    •      
  2. Groups Aim To Shoot Down New State Gun Laws
    •      
  3. Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Locker Room Injury Leads To Municipal Liability Drama
    •      
  5. Jury Convicts Former Aide To House Speaker Donovan
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About The Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Contact The Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Advertise with Us
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media