cbData=article,1,new_york_law_journal,1202579897842
Attorney Faulted for His Conduct as Guardian Pleads Guilty to Grand Larceny in Second Case
Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Special Issues
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts
  • Books
  • Lawjobs
  • Events

Home > Attorney Faulted for His Conduct as Guardian Pleads Guilty to Grand Larceny in Second Case

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Attorney Faulted for His Conduct as Guardian Pleads Guilty to Grand Larceny in Second Case

By Andrew Keshner Contact All Articles 

New York Law Journal

December 3, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 

Related Items

  • Law School Clinic Suggests Improvements for Guardian System

A Brooklyn attorney who was told by a judge last year that he had "squandered and wasted" the assets of a disabled young man he served as guardian now is facing one year in jail for stealing from another of his former charges.

Ray A. Jones, Jr. pleaded guilty on Oct. 25 to second degree grand larceny in exchange for a promise from Supreme Court Justice John Walsh (See Profile) that he would only receive a year in jail. The Brooklyn District Attorney's Office argued in People v. Jones, 4527/2011, that Jones, 53, should receive the maximum sentence of 5 to 15 years in prison.

Jones, who was admitted to practice in 1984, will be disbarred as a result of his felony conviction.

Jones served for seven years as guardian of Josephine Robinson, a woman who suffered brain damage and other injuries giving birth to her daughter 35 years ago.

According to a transcript of the plea proceedings, Assistant District Attorney Michael Spanakos told the court that Jones had stolen $200,000 from Robinson through "layers of documents and transfers."

Jones admitted at the plea allocution that he was guilty of grand larceny, but he did not elaborate. He is due to appear in court on Dec. 6 to make arrangements for sentencing.

According to the district attorney's office, Jones' attorneys advocated a nonjail sentence for their client in a June 19 letter to the court in which they said that Jones was remorseful for what they characterized as "aberrant behavior."

But Spanakos, in his June 28 response, cited the earlier case of Roy Lantigua Jr. to argue that the lawyer's conduct was not an isolated incident.

In March 2011, Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Betsy Barros (See Profile) denied Jones' $83,360 legal fee request and ordered he pay a $501,425 surcharge, plus interest, to the estate of Lantigua, a boy born with a stunted torso, no arms and club feet.

Barros ruled Jones "never acted in Roy's best interest" while "hallmarks" of Jones' work as co-guardian and co-trustee of the youth included "self-dealing" and "a cavalier disregard of Roy's abilities and disabilities" (NYLJ, May 25, 2011). The Lantigua case spurred the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law to establish a guardianship clinic.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Watchdog

    December 03, 2012 07:34 AM

    Please don't forget that Mr. Jones was also a co-guardian of Judge Phillips. That he was never prosecuted in that case defies logic.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Betsy Barros
  • Appellate Division
  • Robinson's
  • Benjamin N. Cardozo School

Key categories

    
  • Criminal Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Bill Davis Helped Shape Tort Law - And Practiced It With A Passion
    •      
  2. Opinion: Amanda Knox Memoir, Truth Or Fiction?
    •      
  3. Litigation Department Of The Year Winner: Robinson & Cole Takes Pride In Quick Reactions, High-Impact Victories
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Litigation Department Of The Year Winner: Ryan Ryan Deluca Touts Stats Proving Its Defense Prowess
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. Disciplinary Counsel Ruled Immune From Suits
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Gibson Dunn Turns Heads as It Climbs Am Law 100 List
  •      
    • Subscription Required

In Executive's Trade Secret Prosecution, a Company's Outsized Role

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment

Judges Weigh Delaware Court of Chancery's Arbitration Program
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe
  • Help
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media