cbData=article,1,new_york_law_journal,1202582811940
Trapped in a Plane for 11 Hours, Passenger's Claims Are Rejected
Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Special Issues
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts
  • Books
  • Lawjobs
  • Events

Home > Trapped in a Plane for 11 Hours, Passenger's Claims Are Rejected

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next

Trapped in a Plane for 11 Hours, Passenger's Claims Are Rejected

December 31, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (3)
 

As a result of the ordeal, Biscone said she missed a friend's film premiere and "important" business meetings that resulted in "lost business opportunities."

Having undergone shoulder surgery six months earlier, she said she experienced cramping, aches and mental distress. She claimed that resulted in six months of physical pain and treatment for panic and anxiety attacks.

Biscone filed her suit in February 2008. She asserted five cause of action: false imprisonment; negligence and negligence per se; intentional infliction of emotion distress; fraud and deceit; and breach of contract.

Among its arguments for dismissal, JetBlue argued the tort claims were preempted by the 1978 Airline Deregulation Act. That law removed government control over airfare and services, and included a preemption provision preventing states from establishing their own regulation.

The preemption clause barred states from "enact[ing] or enforc[ing] a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier that may provide air transportation."

In October 2010, Queens Supreme Court Justice Valerie Brathwaite Nelson (See Profile) held the Airline Deregulation Act did not apply to tort claims for personal injury but did apply to other tort claims pertaining to airline service.

As a result, she dismissed the false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress and fraud and deceit claims. She let the breach of contract claim proceed, along with the negligence claim to the extent it was predicated on personal injury.

On appeal, Biscone said 11-hour confinement on a grounded aircraft was not related to the provision of service contemplated by the federal law's preemption clause.

She also contended the underlying tort claims were too attenuated from the federal law's aim of market deregulation.

JetBlue countered that the preemption clause at issue was broad. The dismissed claims, it argued, were "an impermissible attempt to regulate through state law an airline's operations and practices during ground delays."

Continue reading

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • David D. Murray

    January 02, 2013 03:06 PM

    You can bet that if a Congressman or Senator had been aboard that flight we would have seen a bill proposed before Congress. Short of that, nobody in a position of power really cares. It will take a catastrophic event, like the death of a passenger before anyone takes notice . . . and then the airplane industry will probably prevail. Who said American corporate has no heart . . . I for starters . . ..

  • DirkJohanson

    January 02, 2013 08:40 AM

    The good news here appears to be that if I ever get stuck on a plane like these people were, the crew members' heirs won't be able to sue me for wrongful death.

  • W.Adam Mandelbaum Esq.

    December 29, 2012 08:19 AM

    Next time take the train.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Holland & Knight

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Second Circuit
  • Appellate Division
  • United Air Lines
  • Trans World Airlines
  • Air Transport Association of America
  • John F. Kennedy International Airport
  • JetBlue Airways Corporation
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Key categories

    
  • Transportation Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Bill Davis Helped Shape Tort Law - And Practiced It With A Passion
    •      
  2. Opinion: Amanda Knox Memoir, Truth Or Fiction?
    •      
  3. Litigation Department Of The Year Winner: Robinson & Cole Takes Pride In Quick Reactions, High-Impact Victories
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Litigation Department Of The Year Winner: Ryan Ryan Deluca Touts Stats Proving Its Defense Prowess
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. Disciplinary Counsel Ruled Immune From Suits
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Gibson Dunn Turns Heads as It Climbs Am Law 100 List
  •      
    • Subscription Required

In Executive's Trade Secret Prosecution, a Company's Outsized Role

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment

Judges Weigh Delaware Court of Chancery's Arbitration Program
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe
  • Help
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media