cbData=article,1,national_law_journal,1202582838578
Senate Reauthorizes FISA, a Top DOJ Priority
Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Special Issues
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts
  • Books
  • Lawjobs
  • Events

Home > Senate Reauthorizes FISA, a Top DOJ Priority

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Senate Reauthorizes FISA, a Top DOJ Priority

By Todd Ruger All Articles 

The National Law Journal

December 28, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (2)
 

For the text of this article, see Senate Reauthorizes FISA, a Top DOJ Priority from The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • kay sieverding

    January 02, 2013 12:29 PM

    DOJ scares the hell out of me. I don't have a criminal record.

    There was no "oath or affirmation" but without it DOJ detained me three times for 5 months. I was not criminally charged, did not have an arraignment, did not have a bail hearing, and was not allowed an evidentiary hearing. I was told in Federal Court that I didn't have a right to an attorney. The witnesses against me weren't sworn and I was not allowed to cross examine them. DOJ already filed in Federal Court see D of Columbia 09-0562 document 8-1 that it imprisoned me on purpose.

    The Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 USC section 3142, is supposed to apply to all federal prisoners but even though I stated that I was held without a bail hearing once for 124 days and once for 22 days, David Cotter Rybicki, DOJ counsel, filed "All aspects of the USMS’s investigations and detention of Mrs. Sieverding were lawful", see D of Columbia 09-0562 document 54-1.

  • kay sieverding

    January 02, 2013 11:05 AM

    DOJ scares the hell out of me. I don't have a criminal record.

    There was no "oath or affirmation" but without it DOJ detained me three times for 5 months. I was not criminally charged, did not have an arraignment, did not have a bail hearing, and was not allowed an evidentiary hearing. I was told in Federal Court that I didn't have a right to an attorney. The witnesses against me weren't sworn and I was not allowed to cross examine them. DOJ already filed in Federal Court see D of Columbia 09-0562 document 8-1 that it imprisoned me on purpose.

    The Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 USC section 3142, is supposed to apply to all federal prisoners but even though I stated that I was held without a bail hearing once for 124 days and once for 22 days, David Cotter Rybicki, DOJ counsel, filed "All aspects of the USMS’s investigations and detention of Mrs. Sieverding were lawful", see D of Columbia 09-0562 document 54-1.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • United States Department of Justice
  • Legal Times

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Bill Davis Helped Shape Tort Law - And Practiced It With A Passion
    •      
  2. Opinion: Amanda Knox Memoir, Truth Or Fiction?
    •      
  3. Litigation Department Of The Year Winner: Robinson & Cole Takes Pride In Quick Reactions, High-Impact Victories
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Disciplinary Counsel Ruled Immune From Suits
    •      
  5. Litigation Department Of The Year Winner: Ryan Ryan Deluca Touts Stats Proving Its Defense Prowess
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe
  • Help
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media