cbData=article,1,connecticut_law_tribune,1202584433890
Supreme Court Nominee McDonald Approved By Judiciary Committee
Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Special Issues
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts
  • Books
  • Lawjobs
  • Events

Home > Supreme Court Nominee McDonald Approved By Judiciary Committee

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Supreme Court Nominee McDonald Approved By Judiciary Committee

Catholic church bill was bone of contention for some lawmakers

By THOMAS B. SCHEFFEY All Articles 

The Connecticut Law Tribune

January 14, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Andrew McDonald

Andrew McDonald

Andrew J. McDonald, the former co-chair of the legislative Judiciary Committee, won that panel's overwhelming – but not unanimous – approval Monday to become a state Supreme Court justice. The lawyer-dominated committee voted 40-2 to send the nomination of McDonald, who is currently chief counsel in the governor's office, to the full General Assembly.

The panel also unanimously approved eight-year terms for 10 Superior Court judges, and another term for Appellate Court Judge J. Herbert Greundel.

The questioning, which for other judicial nominees in recent years has been lengthy and probing, was almost cursory. However, Republican lawmakers asked some pointed questions about McDonald's backing of a controversial 2009 bill to alter the internal power organization of Catholic parishes and to give lay leaders more control over parish finances.

McDonald, a former Pullman & Comley partner, explained the measure at length. He stated that it came at the request of Thomas Gallagher, a Greenwich lawyer and Catholic reform activist, in an effort to create a layer of protection after two parishes suffered embezzlement losses from priests in excess of $1 million each. McDonald, who is making state history as the first openly gay Supreme Court nominee, told the lawmakers that he was raised, and baptized Catholic, and remains a church member.

In 2009, just the prospect of having a public hearing on the matter inflamed thousands of citizens, who massed at the Capitol, as mounted police helped keep order. McDonald was threatened with physical harm, he said, and the bill was widely condemned as unconstitutional. It was "boxed" by lawmakers, and never proceeded to a public hearing.

State Rep. Matthew Ritter, D-Hartford, gave an impassioned explanation of the difficulty in knowing whether an issue is constitutional or not, at its earliest stages, after receiving inflammatory emails that morning from McDonald opponents.

Overall, McDonald's former legislative peers expressed admiration and gratitude for his work in the legislature and as their former leader.

Rep. Themis Klarides, R-Derby, asked McDonald about whether his admitted personal friendship with Gov. Dannel Malloy would pose any problem if he becomes a justice. She hinted at past problems of other judicial candidates who were friendly with a governor.

McDonald, who as a lawmaker was a sharp questioner of judicial candidates, closely quizzed Joseph Mengacci in 2004 about his personal social relationship with then-Gov. John Rowland. After Mengacci became incensed, he was criticized for a lack of judicial temperament, and lost his bid for judicial reappointment.

As a lawmaker, McDonald was also a major proponent of same-sex marriage in Connecticut. The leader of the socially conservative Family Institute of Connecticut wanted lawmakers to oppose McDonald. Peter Wolfgang questions whether McDonald will be fair to ''people of traditional values.''

The Judiciary Committee plans to question another Supreme Court nominee, Appellate Judge Carmen Espinosa, later this month or in early February.



Subscribe to The Connecticut Law Tribune

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • 10 Superior Court
  • Family Institute of Connecticut
  • General Assembly
  • Judiciary Committee
  • McDonald's Corporation
  • Pullman & Comley LLC
  • Supreme Court

Key categories

    
  • US Supreme Court

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Questions Raised About Legal Malpractice Policies
    •      
  2. Disciplinary Counsel Ruled Immune From Suits
    •      
  3. Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Lawyer Who Stole Close To $1 Million Can't Practice Law
    •      
  5. Bill Davis Helped Shape Tort Law - And Practiced It With A Passion
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices

NYC Defends Police Department's Use of Stop-and-Frisk

Immigrant Investor Program Gets Watchful Eye

Judge Orders Parties to Hire Expert to Probe Facebook

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lenders Win On Foreclosures
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Justices: Doc Interviews With Defense Are Attorney Work Product
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe
  • Help
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media