Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Special Issues
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts
  • Books
  • Lawjobs
  • Events

Home > King & Spalding Stirs Up Opposition to Bloomberg's Big Drink Ban

Font Size: increase font decrease font

King & Spalding Stirs Up Opposition to Bloomberg's Big Drink Ban

By Brian Baxter Contact All Articles 

The Am Law Daily

January 24, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Two years after the firm lost appellate star Paul Clement by backtracking on a politically controversial case involving gay marriage, King & Spalding's long-standing ties to the U.S. soft drink industry have helped it get behind the NAACP as the organization joins those opposing New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's ban on plus-sized sugary beverages in an effort to combat obesity and encourage healthy living.

King & Spalding is representing the NAACP and The Hispanic Federation in the suit filed last October in New York State Supreme Court by plaintiffs challenging mayoral-mandated limits that go into effect on March 12 prohibiting the sale of soft drinks larger than 16 ounces.

The plaintiffs, identified in court records as the New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce, are backed by powerful business groups and trade associations supported by major soft drink manufacturers, many of whom came out last May to blast Bloomberg's proposal seeking to restrict citizens from slaking their thirst with plentiful portions of sugary liquids.

At a hearing in the case this week, lawyers for those industry groups—represented by Latham & Watkins litigation partner James Brandt, head of the firm's New York office—asked state court Justice Milton Tingling Jr. to overturn Bloomberg's controversial ban, which applies to city-sanctioned purveyors of prepared foods such as delis, movie theaters, restaurants, and stadiums, but exempts convenience stores and supermarkets.

King & Spalding entered the case in early December when it filed an amicus brief on behalf of the NAACP and The Hispanic Federation claiming that the proposed law unfairly affects minority-owned small businesses and denies individuals in low-income communities the freedom to drink whatever they desire.

The NAACP's general counsel is Kim Keenan, who became the youngest attorney and the second woman to hold the position in the organization's history when she was hired in February 2011, according to sibling publication Corporate Counsel. Keenan did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the NAACP's decision to hire King & Spalding for the case, nor did Jones Day M&A of counsel Nicholas Rodriguez, a member of The Hispanic Federation's board of directors.

Litigation partner Ann Cook in New York and Jeffrey Cashdan in Atlanta are leading a King & Spalding team working on the matter. A spokesman for the firm told The Am Law Daily that King & Spalding is pleased to be representing the NAACP and The Hispanic Federation in a case that "raises important issues for these organizations."

The claim by the NAACP and The Hispanic Federation that Bloomberg's big drink ban is discriminatory—the mayor has touted the measure as an effort to improve the health of minorities—has focused attention on the donors to those organizations.

The Coca-Cola Company gave $130,000 in 2011 to causes supported by the NAACP, according to tax filings by The Coca-Cola Foundation, a nonprofit run by the Atlanta-based soda giant. (Katten Muchin Rosenman of counsel Richard Daley, who joined the firm in 2011 after six terms as the mayor of Chicago, is an independent board member at Coca-Cola.)

Coca-Cola is also listed as a funder of The Hispanic Foundation, but in fairness to the group, Bloomberg LP, of which New York's mayor is a majority owner, is also a donor. 

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The Am Law Daily

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Alston & Bird
  • Bancroft
  • Jones Day
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman
  • King & Spalding
  • Latham & Watkins
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • Proskauer Rose
  • Ropes & Gray

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Purchase, New York?based Pepsico
  • New York State Supreme Court
  • Hispanic Federation
  • New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
  • Corporation Counsel
  • Hispanic Foundation
  • New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce
  • American Beverage Association
  • NAACP
  • U.S. Senate
  • Bloomberg LP
  • British American Tobacco plc
  • U.S. House of Representatives
  • The Coca-Cola Company
  • United States Department of Justice

Key categories

    
  • In-House Counsel and Corporate Law Departments

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Questions Raised About Legal Malpractice Policies
    •      
  2. Groups Aim To Shoot Down New State Gun Laws
    •      
  3. Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Jury Convicts Former Aide To House Speaker Donovan
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. Wiggin and Dana Launches China Practice
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About The Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Contact The Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Advertise with Us
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media