Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Special Issues
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts
  • Books
  • Lawjobs
  • Events

Home > Oyster Farm Loses Bid to Stay Open

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Oyster Farm Loses Bid to Stay Open

By Scott Graham Contact All Articles 

The Recorder

February 4, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

SAN FRANCISCO — There is no joy in mudville. A family-owned oyster farm in the Point Reyes National Seashore has struck out in a federal court bid to maintain operations.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled Monday that she had no jurisdiction to intervene in the dispute between Drakes Bay Oyster Co. and the U.S. Department of the Interior. And even if she did have jurisdiction, Gonzalez Rogers would be ruling for the government, she wrote.

The farm, located in the Drakes Bay Estero, has operated under a 40-year lease with the federal government that expired Nov. 30. Since the estuary's designation as potential wilderness in 1976, the business has been the only entity standing in the way of full wilderness status.

Although Interior Secretary Kenneth Salazar had acknowledged "scientific uncertainty and a lack of consensus in the record regarding the precise nature and scope of the impacts" of the company's operations, he declined to renew the company's permit in November.

The company mounted an aggressive challenge to that decision, with more than 80 spectators — both company supporters and environmental advocates opposed to continued farming — turning out for last month's federal court hearing in Gonzalez Rogers' Oakland courtroom.

"The court finds that, generally, courts do have jurisdiction to review an agency's inaction, or failure to act, on a permit," Gonzalez Rogers wrote. "However, where, as here, Congress has authorized the secretary to act (or not act) on a specific, discrete circumstance with discretion, that particular act falls within" a provision of the Administrative Procedure Act that precludes jurisdiction.

Even if she had jurisdiction, "plaintiffs have not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of the claims nor that the balancing of the equities favors injunctive relief," Gonzalez Rogers wrote.

Environmentalists were elated by the decision. "The court ruling affirms that our national parks will be safe from privatization schemes, and that special places like Drakes Estero will rise above attempts to hijack Americans' wilderness," said Neil Desai, of the National Parks Conservation Association, in a written statement. "Taxpayers can rejoice that the land they bought and own in Point Reyes National Seashore will now be protected as planned after 40 years of waiting."

A lawyer for the oyster farm owners said they weren't yet prepared to comment on the ruling.



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Drakes Bay Oyster Co.
  • National Parks Conservation Association
  • United States Department of the Interior

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Another Former Connecticut AG Lands Law Firm Job
    •      
  2. Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit
    •      
  3. Judge Quinn To Retire As Chief Court Administrator
    •      
  4. Class Of 1,500 Auto Body Repair Shops Entitled To $20M In Punitives
    •      
  5. New Connecticut Privacy Guide Reflects Technology Advances
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

3rd Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Texas DA Faces Removal Suits Over DWI, Alleged Misconduct
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About The Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Contact The Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Advertise with Us
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media