Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Special Issues
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts
  • Books
  • Lawjobs
  • Events

Home > Many Lawyers Caught Up In Gifting Tables Case

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Many Lawyers Caught Up In Gifting Tables Case

Attorney endorsements were big selling point for participants

By THOMAS B. SCHEFFEY All Articles 

The Connecticut Law Tribune

February 8, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
U.S. District Judge Alvin W. Thompson

U.S. District Judge Alvin W. Thompson

Shelley P. Marcus, a nominee for a Superior Court judgeship, endured tough questioning last week over her role as an attorney for 21 "gifting table" clients who paid her and the Marcus Law Firm more than $50,000 for civil representation.

But she is hardly the only member of the legal community who turned up in the federal probe of the allegedly criminal scheme.

While reports initially focused on well-to-do suburban homemakers, it's now clear that a Hamden lawyer, the office manager of a New Haven law firm, the wife of a former inhouse counsel, a former Tyler, Alcorn & Cooper attorney, and other lawyers either were participants or along the way offered encouraging legal advice to participants.

Last week, the prosecution of gifting table participants Jill Platt and Donna Bello, both of Guilford, continued in U.S. District Court in Hartford before U.S. District Judge Alvin Thompson. Platt is represented by Johathan Einhorn, of New Haven, and Bello by Norman Pattis, of Bethany. The women are charged with five counts of wire fraud and tax evasion as the alleged leaders of the enterprise, which prosecutors say took in some $5 million beginning in 2008.

The gifting tables works roughly like this: New members pay $5,000 to get in on the bottom row of the table, known as the "appetizer" level. As new members join, their name moves up the table. When they get to the top, or the "dessert" level, they receive a $40,000 payout.

In 2009, when then-Attorney General Richard Blumenthal began investigating the tables, Platt and Bello were told that potential liability came from a statute known as the contingent transactions act, which is typically enforced by the Department of Consumer Protection. The statute says it's "unlawful" to offer a rebate or special price based on the customer bringing in other customers or sales.

In this case, the potential legal penalties rose over time, for a small few at the top.

'People Knew'

The government's first witness last week was Joy Bershtein, a gifting table participant and a lawyer at Hamden's Bershtein Law Center. She said the group met about 20 times a year, on Monday evenings, with each woman bringing a dish or wine.

Under cross-examination, Bershtein said she didn't advertise the fact that she was a lawyer. "I was myself. If people asked, I told them," Berstein testified.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to The Connecticut Law Tribune

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Tyler, Alcorn & Cooper
  • US District Court
  • Superior Court
  • Chubb Corporation
  • University of Bridgeport
  • Internal Revenue Service
  • Democratic Party
  • Department of Consumer Protection

Key categories

    
  • Tax
  • White Collar Crime
  • Law Firm Administration
  • Judges

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit
    •      
  2. Judge Quinn To Retire As Chief Court Administrator
    •      
  3. New Connecticut Privacy Guide Reflects Technology Advances
    •      
  4. No More Automatic Fee Waivers For Low-Income Litigants
    •      
  5. Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corbett Signs Bill to Eliminate Traffic Court

Christian College Granted Injunction In Obamacare Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About The Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Contact The Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Advertise with Us
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media