cbData=article,1,connecticut_law_tribune,1202588481580
Connecticut Yankee Nuclear Plant Awarded $39.7 Million
Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Special Issues
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts
  • Books
  • Lawjobs
  • Events

Home > Connecticut Yankee Nuclear Plant Awarded $39.7 Million

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Connecticut Yankee Nuclear Plant Awarded $39.7 Million

The U.S. Energy Department will reimburse ratepayers for not removing radioactive materials

By CHRISTIAN NOLAN All Articles 

The Connecticut Law Tribune

February 15, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Back in 1996, the Connecticut Yankee nuclear power plant in Haddam Neck was shut down because it was too costly to keep operating. Dangerous radiation had leaked from the plant in 1978 and again in 1989, which contributed to the decision.

But even after the plant closed, the meter kept running.

Under a contract that was tied to the operation of the plant, the federal government was supposed to take possession of the spent nuclear fuel at the site starting in 1998, but never did. As a result, the company paid more than $10 million a year to keep the materials secure.

The federal Department of Energy had attempted to build a repository to permanently store the waste in Nevada's Yucca Mountain, but its efforts to remove and store the fuel rods and other waste didn't materialize. In a lawsuit that was filed in 1998, the plant owner accused the federal government of being in breach of its contract to remove the materials from the state. The suit was joined by two other nuclear plants in New England.

This month, the federal government agreed in a settlement to pay the owners of the closed Connecticut Yankee plant $39.7 million for the costs related to removing the radioactive materials, which had been paid by electric customers, but never done. The settlement agreement calls for the government to reimburse an additional $120 million to the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. and Yankee Atomic Electric Co. in Massachusetts. Because electric customers in the three states had been paying the federal government for the cost of storing the nuclear waste, plans are being filed with the Federal Energy Regulation Commission to establish a process to distribute the funds.

Owners of the three plants said the entire $160 million settlement will be returned to the rate payers, after adjustments are made for state and federal taxes. The money has already been transferred from the U.S. Treasury to the three companies.

In a statement from the owners of the three plants, which are part of a consortium of New England utility companies, the companies plan to find "the best way to use the proceeds from the damage awards to benefit the ratepayers."

The three plants, which were all decommissioned at around the same time, together sued the government for breach of contract. In August 2004 there was a seven week trial on damages in federal court. Various appeals dragged the process out until last May when the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a decision by U.S. Court of Federal Claims Senior Judge James F. Merow.

In addition to the $39.7 million awarded to Connecticut Yankee, Maine Yankee was awarded $81.7 million and Yankee Atomic $38.3 million.

Some say the settlements are just the beginning. That is because the issue of disposing of the spent nuclear waste remains unsolved.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The Connecticut Law Tribune

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
  • Nuclear Energy Institute
  • U.S. Treasury
  • Yankee Atomic Electric Company
  • Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company
  • Energy Department
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Bill Davis Helped Shape Tort Law - And Practiced It With A Passion
    •      
  2. Opinion: Amanda Knox Memoir, Truth Or Fiction?
    •      
  3. Litigation Department Of The Year Winner: Robinson & Cole Takes Pride In Quick Reactions, High-Impact Victories
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Litigation Department Of The Year Winner: Ryan Ryan Deluca Touts Stats Proving Its Defense Prowess
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. Disciplinary Counsel Ruled Immune From Suits
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe
  • Help
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media