Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Special Issues
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts
  • Books
  • Lawjobs
  • Events

Home > Legislators Look To Stop 'Serial Litigators'

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Legislators Look To Stop 'Serial Litigators'

By JAY STAPLETON All Articles 

The Connecticut Law Tribune

March 1, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Gerald Fox III

Gerald Fox III

She's not licensed to practice law in any state, but Cecelia Lebby spends so much time arguing in court that she considers it "a full-time job."

Lebby's last paid position was in a doughnut shop several years ago and she relies on disability income of about $700 month to survive. But her proficiency with pen and paper has made her well-known among judges in the New Britain Judicial District, where she has filed more than 80 lawsuits and 40 appeals. Lebby insists she is just protecting her legal rights from abusive acts.

"I just don't want to be wronged by people," she said. "I figure if I filed lawsuits, they would back off."

Lebby's prolific efforts have recently led her to be identified as one of a handful of "serial litigators" in the state. Because she is legally indigent, Lebby doesn't have to pay any court filing fees, and so she files for free — and files freely. But now, people like her are being targeted by some lawmakers.

A bill proposed by state Representative Timothy Bowles, D-Preston, would make poor people complete community service hours in exchange for having filing fees waived. Bowles said if a pro se knew he or she would have to put in several hours of added labor, that would cut down on the number of litigants who file 10 or 15 lawsuits a year.

Although of the total number of cases statewide filed by serial litigators isn't available, Bowles said the problem is real. "If we can close that loophole, I would be more satisfied," Bowles said. "These cases clog up the court system."

Even if his legislation doesn't pass, Bowles is hopeful that a discussion will raise possible solutions to the problem.

State Representative Gerald Fox III, co-chair of the Judiciary Committee, has agreed to at least consider the measure. "We offered to raise it for a public hearing and see what happens," Fox said. "I think there are some [legislators] who have reservations about it, but there are some who want to explore the issue."

Hesitant Judges

All told, the Judicial Branch waives about $2.8 million a year in fees for hundreds of indigent people. Under state law, not only is the $350 filing fee covered, but so is the $40 cost of state marshals serving the lawsuits.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to The Connecticut Law Tribune

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Target Corporation
  • New Haven County Bar Association
  • Greater New Haven Legal Assistance Association
  • Brett Michaels Fan Club
  • Walmart, Connecticut Light & Power
  • Judicial Branch
  • Torrington Police Department
  • Family Dollar Stores Inc.
  • Superior Court
  • Judiciary Committee
  • Supreme Court

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Questions Raised About Legal Malpractice Policies
    •      
  2. Groups Aim To Shoot Down New State Gun Laws
    •      
  3. Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Jury Convicts Former Aide To House Speaker Donovan
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. Wiggin and Dana Launches China Practice
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About The Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Contact The Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Advertise with Us
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media