GAL Reform Bill Moves Forward

Parents say Judiciary Committee measure doesn't go far enough

, The Connecticut Law Tribune

   | 1 Comments

The Legislature's Judiciary Committee has approved a bill proposing reforms for the state's guardian ad litem system that would give parents a greater say as to who would represent their children during custody proceedings, as well as new authority to request the removal of a GAL from a case.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Jim Clark

    The net result of over-regulating and under-paying GALs will be to drive well-trained attorneys out of the business of protecting children. Only those dedicated to child protection regardless of cost or the inexperienced or hungry attorneys will be left. That‘s what has happened in criminal GAL appointments, where the fees are ridiculously low, and unchanged since 2008.
    I wonder how many of the complaints the legislature heard came from BOTH parties to a dissolution? Is the legislature going to rush into this "reform" based upon testimony mostly of people who just didn‘t like the result?
    Maybe this should be tabled, and the Office of Legislative Research should look into it.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202649875681

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.