Conn. Supreme Court HIPAA Decision Likely to Spawn More Litigation
This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.
To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.
Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com
What's being said
-
This establishes precedent for lawsuits against AMC/GALs, and other so called "court appointed experts" working on family cases who blatantly flout HIPAA and other laws designed to protect parent‘s and children‘s medical information. What happened in the recent Grennan case shows how hypocritical our Supreme Court has been on this issue.
Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.
Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202676138225
Thank you!
This article's comments will be reviewed.
Law Firm Founded By Veterans Opens New Conn. Office
College Football Player's Family Awarded $2 Million After Fatal Crash
Editorial: Time to Euthanize the Probate Court System?
Man Sentenced in Threat Against State Judge
Real Estate Firm That Enforced No-Children Rule Settles Discrimination Claim
ADD COMMENT