Legally Conservative

Bridgeport Guardians Case: Moving The Money Around

, The Connecticut Law Tribune

Last week, in Part I of an expose on Bridgeport Guardians v. Delmonte (Law Tribune, Feb. 20, 2012), I introduced readers to a poster case for the shenanigans and machinations that can occur in a federal court race case when no one is looking. In follow-ups, I will show what happens when someone starts looking and dares to object, but is shooed away by the judge, whose questionable orders issue with the blessing of colluding parties.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at