• Connecticut Appellate Court
  • AC 33097
  • Apr 10 2012 (Date Decided)
  • Per Curiam
The trial court properly granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment on the ground that the allegations in the complaint sounded in medical malpractice rather than ordinary negligence and, as a result, that the plaintiff was required to disclose an expert witness which he did not do.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now