Sanzo v. Sanzo August 6, 2012 | 0 Comments | SEE FULL TEXT OPINION share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints Connecticut Appellate Court Lavine, J. Because none of the parties filed a motion to open, the court lacked the authority to modify substantively an oral judgment rendered at a hearing in its subsequent written judgment. VIEW COMMENTS ( 0 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202565669008 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.