• Superior Court
  • Hartford J.D., at Hartford
  • CV11-6022374S
  • Aug 16 2012 (Date Decided)
  • Schuman, J.
A factual misstatement in a contract about the absence of litigation may not provide a cause of action for negligent and intentional misrepresentation, if the plaintiff did not actually or reasonably rely on the misstatement, because the plaintiff was orally informed about the existence of litigation.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now