• Compensation Review Board
  • Compensation Review Board
  • 5659 CRB-8-11-6
  • Jun 01 2012 (Date Decided)
  • Mastropietro with Barton and Engel
The rule from the 2003 Connecticut Supreme Court case of Hatt v. Burlington Coat Factory is that the insurer on the risk for the more recent of two injuries is responsible for the entire subsequent liability; but, Hatt was inapplicable here, where the claimant did not sustain two serial or combined disabling injuries but two separate and distinct knee injuries to each knee and either knee replacement would totally disable the claimant following surgery.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now