State v. Paredes November 19, 2012 | 0 Comments | SEE FULL TEXT OPINION share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints Connecticut Appellate Court Lavine, J. When the primary purpose of videotaped statements is to receive a medical diagnosis or treatment, not future criminal prosecution, the confrontation clause is not implicated. VIEW COMMENTS ( 0 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202578950217 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.