• Connecticut Appellate Court
  • Connecticut Appellate Court
  • AC 33529
  • Nov 13 2012 (Date Decided)
  • Lavine, J.
When the primary purpose of videotaped statements is to receive a medical diagnosis or treatment, not future criminal prosecution, the confrontation clause is not implicated.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now