• U.S. District Court
  • U.S. District Court
  • 3:12cv220
  • Nov 16 2012 (Date Decided)
  • Eginton, J.
Allegations that although the plaintiff marked its technological information as "confidential" and took steps to protect the information, the information, which was not generally known, was used without the plaintiff's consent can be sufficient to state a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now