• Superior Court
  • Stamford-Norwalk J.D., at Stamford
  • CV12-6012442S
  • Jan 18 2013 (Date Decided)
  • Tobin, J.T.R.
In an underinsured-motorist case in which the plaintiff's insurance company claims that the defendant possessed coverage and was not, in fact, underinsured, a court can reject the plaintiff's argument that proof of payment is required and that proof of insurance coverage is insufficient.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now