• Connecticut Supreme Court
  • Connecticut Supreme Court
  • SC 18846
  • Mar 12 2013 (Date Decided)
  • Norcott, J.
A motion for clarification was the proper method for resolving an ambiguous judgment because the motion did not seek to change the terms or substance of the judgment, but merely sought to resolve the ambiguity in the judgment by reconciling a discrepancy between the court's factual findings and its orders.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now