Cook v. Family Dollar Stores of Connecticut Inc. April 8, 2013 | 0 Comments | SEE FULL TEXT OPINION share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints Superior Court Dooley, J. When individualized proof is required, plaintiffs may not prove that questions of law or fact common to the putative class predominate over questions that affect only individual members. VIEW COMMENTS ( 0 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202595202799 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.