The Appellate Court summarily affirmed the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the self-represented defendants, David and Catherine Gombos, and was not persuaded by the claims on appeal of the pro se plaintiff, Charles Gianetti, a physician. The Court noted that Gianetti offered a limited record and his brief failed to identify, discuss or analyze any Connecticut statutes or case law relating to the type, meaning and effect of assignments, including but not limited to the relevant statutes or case law existing at the time of the specific assignment prepared by the plaintiff and executed by the defendants in this case.

VIEW FULL CASE