Geico General Insurance Co. v. Tibolla April 29, 2013 | 0 Comments | SEE FULL TEXT OPINION share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints Superior Court Domnarski, J. An insurance company may not be required to defend or indemnify an operator who lacked permission to drive or a reasonable belief that he had permission to drive. VIEW COMMENTS ( 0 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202598144238 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.