Disciplinary Counsel Ruled Immune From Suits

For the first time in Connecticut, a federal judge has ruled that attorneys with the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Council should be granted the same immunity from lawsuits as judges and state prosecutors.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Ginger Bailey

    perhaps it is time to give these rulings as well as appointing Judges to the citizens of Connecticut. The legislative Judicial Committee allows civil servants to re-assign property as non-judicial state employees (they are not judges they are lawyers) of the Probate Court Committee, the Legislative Judicial Committee appoints judges whose criminality can be traced, the legislative judicial committee ignores any complaints from citizens of nepotism (probate court administrator Thomas Gaffey and Chief Clerk of the Appellate Court), they ignore and now condone the coercion of citizens by Patricia King the Chief Disciplinary counsel of the Statewide Grievance Committee to drop cases that might implicate favored lawyers or judges taking kickbacks.
    This is why Connecticut is the second most judicially corrupt state of all 50.
    Time for the Citizens to vote on these items not lawyers for lawyers for lawyers for lawyers ...

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202600444327

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.

Recommended for You